Big Fat Facts Big Fat Index

Conscious Choice: Simmering Fat Hatred [Updated]

You know, this whole "environmentalists versus fat people" thing is a hot topic lately. It seems that, for some reason, you can't be a fat environmentalist - just like you can't be a fat vegetarian. Right?

Well over in a comment thread at The F Word, Tari linked to this incredibly insensitive tripe from the publisher of Conscious Choice. Conscious Choice is a magazine based here in Chicago. I read it semi-regularly when I was vegetarian (AND FAT) and still do every now and then. It's a pretty open-minded journal focusing on vegetarians, vegans, and Earth-friendly stuff.

Most of the time.

Publisher Richard McGinnis has a lot of hangups with food and fat people (naturally, he's someone who can't separate these two things in his head; overeating = fat for him.) He starts out by admitting that he loves - ready? - an organic bakery and notes that he's not overweight "(yet?)" He then goes on to say that just because something is organic doesn't mean it's good for you (duh?) He stresses that this is a... conscious choice and apparently, it's the worst thing ever. Because he might get fat. Ooga booga.

Oh, but it gets better. McGinnis talks about how Conscious Choice doesn't censor advertisers, and how the magazine is all about freedom of choice. But then the Irony Anvil drops from the sky:

How would you feel if someone was making your choices for you?

Having said that, I still cringe at the local grocery when I see an overweight mom with her overweight kids buying GMO-laden toaster pastries and sugary pop. There have been times I wanted to snatch something out of the basket of a fellow shopper. Who am I, though? Let he who has not sinned cast the first stone. I think someone famous said that. He might have even had an organic brownie in his mouth at the time.

OMG. Just... (sigh) McGinnis is doing nothing to keep me on his side, you know? Indeed, who are you, Richard?

I'd like to know how he feels about people he doesn't deem fat who buy this stuff. Does he still feel the same way? And in any case, what the hell does it matter what size these people are? It's totally unnecessary. If he wants to promote the "organic or bust" argument, there's absolutely no reason to bring fat into the issue, unless he wants to prove he's a bigot.

I wrote him a letter and thought I'd share this paragraph:

The only thing this editorial did for me was prove your biases. Before you dragged fat into it, you waxed about your love of an organic bakery and practically said that it was going to make you fat. If it did, what would be wrong with that? Fat is not something to fear; it is simply a state of being. On the other hand maybe you were fearing the repercussions of being fat - not the largely-debunked "health" ones - but the discrimination. Conscious Choice could fire you for being fat, and you'd have no legal recourse. And you could be denied healthcare. And best of all, you could hear from elitist environmentalists, vegans, and vegetarians who would claim you were the scourge of our society because of your size.

I want to save the planet too. I don't need to justify my actions to anyone, but I will share that I walk to the train I take to work every day. I don't drive pretty much at all during the week. But according to McGinnis, and the folks who published those craptastic "lose weight and save the planet!!!" studies, I'd still have to lose weight.

Like Tari, I hate that BS. I'm fed up with PETA, Conscious Choice, and all of these so-called enlightened eco-friendly organizations who paint us as the enemy, the problem, and the things that need to be fixed. Fat people are not the enemy, not the problem, and most of all we do not need to be fixed because we are not fucking broken.

Update: Richard McGinnis blew me off. Thanks, there.

Around the Fatosphere | Welcome Elastic Waist Readers!

paul November 17th, 2007 | Link | PS

We should put together an ad, and buy ad space in Conscious Choice.

TariRocks's picture
TariRocks
November 17th, 2007 | Link | Damn skippy!

I would *LOVE* to buy some ad space. That would be brilliant! Can that be a COFRA thing?

It's starting to piss me off how rampant this blame-the-fatty environmentalism is becoming. I read a lot of green blogs and mags and it's becoming a once-a-week (at least) thing. I swear, it's like they've hired a marketing department who told them that fat was the fearmongering holy fucking grail (especially since we're also now a threat to national security and all)!

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!

rachelr's picture
rachelr
November 17th, 2007 | Link | OOo, I like the ad idea.

OOo, I like the ad idea. Can we do one of those PeTA kinds of ads, in which we photograph a naked woman as if she were a piece of meat to promote veganism, but make it a photo of a FAT naked woman?

Meowzer November 17th, 2007 | Link | They really will take an ad

They really will take an ad from anyone who ponies up the cash? Well, then what are we waiting for?

Here's a starter idea: "Big Ass. Small Footprint. Yes, You'd Better Believe It's Possible."

And speaking of an entirely different kind of big ass, at least this guy admits he himself has his own vices. But of course, the classism demonstrated here is completely nauseating, as is the sizism. Like you said, Paul, I doubt he shakes with revulsion when he sees thin people with a cart full of beer and chips.

rebelle November 17th, 2007 | Link | Re: His possible reaction to

Re: His possible reaction to thin people with beer and chips, etc.--Something just struck me. I wonder if the reason people like Richard preach the gospel of thin is because they believe that only the thin have the "right" to eat what they want and enjoy it, and, therefore, THAT is the real reason they want to be thin?
And they claim we're the ones who are obsessed with food and who are under its thumb. Hah!

sevendayswonder November 17th, 2007 | Link | Haha, I made that last

Haha, I made that last "fixin" comment before I even read this. Concern trolls abound.

stef's picture
stef
November 17th, 2007 | Link | I like Meowser's idea. I

I like Meowser's idea.

I also love "Ooga booga." Sometimes that's pretty much all I have to say anymore in response to fat hatred.

"OMG, look at the nekkid carbs in that woman's shopping cart!"
"OOGA BOOGA!"

MichMurphy November 18th, 2007 | Link | I think it's sort of amusing

I think it's sort of amusing that he starts with this: "I don’t think I have an eating disorder."

And then goes on to say: "For weeks before my annual physical, I go fiber crazy. Cleansing teas and increased cardio exercises are de rigueur. Then, when I barely pass the LDL/HDL exam, I go right back to my passionate encounters with fair trade organic chocolate brownies."

Sounds kinda like restrained eating and punitive exercise to me. But what do I know; I'm fat.

And with this: "Having said that, I still cringe at the local grocery when I see an overweight mom with her overweight kids buying GMO-laden toaster pastries and sugary pop. There have been times I wanted to snatch something out of the basket of a fellow shopper..." I'd also say he's got a dysfunctional relationship not only with food but also with, oh, say, the whole of humanity.

I'm glad he says he's never followed through on that little food-fascist fantasy, but it's borderline psychopathic at best.

I am also getting tired of being the terror within AND the cause of global warming. How long will it take people to understand that stereotypes are inherently inaccurate and do nothing but marginalize people and promote hatred?

If anyone decides to buy some advertising space, I'll chip in.

paul November 18th, 2007 | Link | Advertising

OK folks, so here's Conscious Choice's media kit in PDF.

Pricing for one-offs:

Back cover: $3700
Inside cover: $3300
Full page: $2500
2/3 Page: $1995
1/2 Page: $1395
1/3 Page: $1150
1/4 Page: $800
1/6 Page: $650

It does go down when you buy more than one but, let's start here.

So what do you all think? Should we shoot for a half or quarter? And who wants to put an ad together?

rachelr's picture
rachelr
November 18th, 2007 | Link | Oh, wow. That's expensive.

Oh, wow. That's expensive. If we're going to spend that kind of money, I'd suggest placing an ad in a publication that reaches a broader audience than just Chicago.

If we can figure out how to pay for one, I can lend my print publishing skills to putting it together.

Linda November 18th, 2007 | Link | Um yeah, if you think that

Um yeah, if you think that eating sugar, chocolate, eggs, and butter is "irresponsible", and you obsess about it, I'd call that an eating disorder. Personally, I'd much rather be mentally and physically healthy, regardless of whether I was also thin or fat, than eating disordered. But that's just me.

And oh god, the "fat mom and fat kids with a cart full of fake food" story. It's reached mythical proportions amongst the fat-phobic in our society. They all seem to think it to be such a brilliantly insightful indictment. (Pardon me as my eyes roll out of my head.) As if to be fat means to eat poorly. And as if it isn't just as unhealthy when thin people eat poorly.

baddecisionmaker November 19th, 2007 | Link | i think this fatphobia in the env. movement has to do with class

Yes, I've noticed a lot of fat-phobic bullshit coming out of environmentalist communities/activists too. I don't really like a lot of environmentalist communities for those and a lot of other reasons having to do with messed up politics/elitism, but I'm pretty into the biking/critical mass community here in chicago and I've noticed a bunch of fat-hating comments, in subtle and more direct ways, pop up on the listserve a lot (and got some pretty strong knee jerk reactions when I called it out). in both joke/point of reference for someone being lazy/ a jerk/an asshole car driver and in the moral panic about health and the fatness=unhealthiness automatically vein.

I think this form of fatphobia is very intertwined with classism, and racism too. Fears about excess, and who "takes too much," and elite rich white people preferences/abilities to be skinny are all tied up in this. I think fat-phobia and clasism (and racism) help make each other, and it goes back & forth both ways. I think there's a lot to this, but I'm too tired/busy to finish articulating it now.

MichMurphy November 19th, 2007 | Link | "I think this form of

"I think this form of fatphobia is very intertwined with classism, and racism too. Fears about excess, and who "takes too much," and elite rich white people preferences/abilities to be skinny are all tied up in this. I think fat-phobia and classism (and racism) help make each other, and it goes back & forth both ways."

Completely agree. Fatphobia is totally connected to those isms (as well as sexism), and is so ingrained that the people spewing it out of one side of their mouth (while they spout about 'equality' from the other side) don't even see it for what it is. People who are supposedly categorically OPPOSED to classism and racism and sexism seem to have zero problem hating fat people. Which is appearance-based discrimination. Which is wrong. If the people buying into the "moral panic" about fat and excessive consumption really want to talk morals, I'd be quick to point out that a person's appearance (or health status) is not an inherently moral issue, but hating people for the assumptions you make based on the way they look IS.

If environmentalists really want to make a difference, that should mean recruiting people to be on their side -- not taking up this exclusivist, classist and potentially racist kind of elite bullshit. If environmentalism is to be anything other than another useless status symbol, it's got to include people (and last time I checked, the "overweight" were a significant segment of the population...might be a good idea to stop insulting them) and stop blaming random individuals for an entire society's problem.

Real life is never as simple as the good guys in white hats and the bad guys in black hats. The same goes for people's bodies -- you simply can't pick out the "overconsumers" from the rest based on body size. I would expect people who are capable of understanding the complex issues surrounding ecology to understand this. But I shudder to think what could happen if the economy and environmental stuff worsens and this assumption remains.

amanda8501's picture
amanda8501
November 19th, 2007 | Link | The pricing on the ads are

The pricing on the ads are not too bad for a city like chicago, but I would think that there are better magazines that can target the audience that we want better than that. The problem that we will find is that most national magazines have outragous pricing that is in the hundred thousands. Personally, I think we might do better using newspapers and places where smart "rational" people frequent.

TariRocks's picture
TariRocks
November 19th, 2007 | Link | Yikes, that's not cheap. I

Yikes, that's not cheap.

I wonder if there are other ways we could confront this BS. Any of the journalistic types want to try to pitch a social justice piece? Maybe we could bombard them with letters to the editor? Hell, I'd go sit outside their offices on Franklin and protest or something.

paul November 19th, 2007 | Link | UGH.

Flippant response from the publisher:

"Thank you for your well crafted, and... ummm... emotional response.
Perhaps you will enjoy or [sic] tips on centering a [sic] relaxing more than our
editorial opinions?"

UGH. WTF. Dude, I meditate.

Thanks for not taking it seriously. Whatsoever.

My letter was firm but not jerky, and this response was... bothersome.

goddess's picture
goddess
November 19th, 2007 | Link | Okay. Well, I favor putting

Okay. Well, I favor putting a half-pager in Conscious Choice. One: because it's not all that much money, comparatively, and we've got to start thinking beyond nickles and dimes Right Now. (We also need to start raising funds Right Now, not just paying for each thing we want to do as we think of it.) Two: because Conscious Choice does seem to reach a lot of people. At least, from my point of view; I'm always running into people who mention reading it or finding a resource through it. It may not be the broadest communication vehicle, but we could start here, anyway. And if we start raising money asap, we can start putting ads in other places, so we still don't have to rule out Conscious Choice. Three: because it makes some sense to rebut the article that just appeared.

I can help with putting together an ad. It's probably a good idea to have several heads working on this, especially since we don't have a well-articulated pitch yet. And I'll throw in some cash for the ad, if it's decided that we will do this. Or that we put an ad in something else.
Now: How do we decide? Are we going to vote? And who will do the voting? And when? blah blah blah...

TariRocks's picture
TariRocks
November 19th, 2007 | Link | Ugh.

I haven't received a response to my letter yet. The response to yours is definitely obnoxious and, er, kind of maddening actually. If I get a blow-off like that....I'm going to be that much more motivated to take some action.

CarrieP's picture
CarrieP
November 19th, 2007 | Link | I think if we are going to

I think if we are going to purchase ad space somewhere and get the message out, the whole liberal/organic/green crowd is a perfect place to start. Most greenies are already predisposed to rejecting the ideas force-fed to them by the media and will be more willing to consider an idea that goes against conventional wisdom.

Kunoichi November 19th, 2007 | Link | Most greenies are already

Most greenies are already predisposed to rejecting the ideas force-fed to them by the media and will be more willing to consider an idea that goes against conventional wisdom.

*snort* Not where I live! *L*

I've never heard of this magazine before this thread. Don't think I'll be on the lookout for it, either. Puzzled

goddess's picture
goddess
November 19th, 2007 | Link | Oh! And anybody who belongs

Oh! And anybody who belongs to a green or greenish organization (I do) can do their thing directly. I'm mentally planning some kind of strategy for educating the hundred-odd active members of my co-op, who profess to be extremely tolerant of differences. Quite a few larger children attend this co-op's summer camp, and I'm thinking the staff training can include size tolerance training. I wonder what else I can do...
Somehow, having a Real Organization behind my efforts makes me think more creatively and productively!

TariRocks's picture
TariRocks
November 20th, 2007 | Link | Most greenies are already

Most greenies are already predisposed to rejecting the ideas force-fed to them by the media and will be more willing to consider an idea that goes against conventional wisdom.

I totally agree - except where fat is concerned. It seems like their ability to question the mainstream media (and advertisers and government and whatever other Powers That Be) is completely hamstrung when it comes to this one thing. That's definitely an angle I work whenever I get a chance in dealing with alternative types and greenies, though.

I also throw in the social justice concept a lot, because so many alternative/green groups go out of their way to make space for socio-economic and racial diversity...and body diversity shouldn't be any different.

vidyapriya November 22nd, 2007 | Link | I totally agree - except

I totally agree - except where fat is concerned. It seems like their ability to question the mainstream media (and advertisers and government and whatever other Powers That Be) is completely hamstrung when it comes to this one thing. That's definitely an angle I work whenever I get a chance in dealing with alternative types and greenies, though.

I concur. I split my online time between the fat-rights blogosphere and vegan groups, and it seems like I always need to call out my fellow vegans on lipophobia. These are the same people who will not tolerate the slightest trace of misogyny, homophobia, or racism (except that fat hatred is linked with all of those things...).

I'd still be delighted to see BFB put an ad in such a publication, though. I'd like to see it emphasize the presence of fat people in every part of the environmental movement -- vegetarianism/veganism, bicycling/walking (rather than driving), natural medicine, etc.

Meowzer November 22nd, 2007 | Link | Don't a lot of people become

Don't a lot of people become vegans to lose weight? Yes, I know they also care about animals and ecology and all that good stuff, but I think weight loss is a strong motivator for a lot of them.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.